MVP MMA Case Study: Audience and Narrative Baseline Findings.

Sep 25, 2026 · @Nathan · Town Squared Strategies

Deliverable 2 of 5. It tests the issue analysis ratings against search and Reddit data. Independent portfolio case study built only from public information; not affiliated with or endorsed by MVP or PFL.

Data. D1 is page one of Google for 15 queries (113 results). D2 is the top 50 comments in each of three r/MMA threads (150 comments). Both were captured on 2026-09-25 and coded by hand, with sample reviews approved. All findings are observational and not representative of the full fan base. Facts still come from P and S sources.

1. Bottom line

The data confirms Leadership (Issue 4) and the UFC narrative (Issue 3) at High likelihood. It raises "fighter-first" credibility (Issue 2) to High and keeps roster and fan integration (Issue 1) at Medium, with a new brand-name risk. The largest messaging opportunities are questions audiences search for that no company page answers: who owns the company, who runs it, what fighters are paid, and where to watch in 2027.

2. Findings by issue

Issue 4: Leadership (confirmed High).

Issue 3: UFC narrative (confirmed High; the direction differs).

Issue 2: "Fighter-first" (raised to High).

Issue 1: Roster and fan integration (confirmed Medium; new risk).

3. Messaging opportunities

OpportunityEvidenceUse
Ownership explainer"Does Jake Paul own it?"-type questions appear in People Also Ask for 10 of 15 queries; no owned answer [D1]Owned content; proof of structure
Named chief executiveCEO questions go unanswered; stale sources name Martin [D1]Leadership page; spokesperson plan
Pay proof pointsPay questions appear in 6 of 15 queries; fans cite sponsor freedom favorably [D1, D2]"Fighter-first" proof points: sponsor freedom [P9] and $40,000 minimum [P10], both MVP MMA 1 only until extended
Correct the Netflix assumption7 comments assume MVP MMA airs on Netflix in the U.S. [D2]; no U.S. partner is announced [P3, P4]Use "U.S. partner to be announced" consistently
Let fans carry the UFC contrast"Competition helps fighters and fans" is the leading positive frame [D2]Avoid company rivalry claims (Issue 3 guidance)
Crossover FAQ and search identity2027 where-to-watch gap; brand-name collision [D1]FAQ; pair "MVP MMA" with "Most Valuable Promotions"

4. Rating changes (approved 2026-09-25)

IssueChange
1. Roster and fan integrationRating unchanged. Adds risk 6: the brand name collides in search.
2. "Fighter-first" credibilityLikelihood raised from Medium to High. This is a judgment on mixed evidence: D1 supports it, while D2 shows no doubt expressed.
3. UFC narrativeRating unchanged. Risk 1 revised on talent flow.
4. LeadershipRating unchanged. Adds stale CEO listings and fan speculation.

The priority order holds.

Data tab

data/D1_serp/D1_results_coded.csv (113 results) · data/D1_serp/D1_serp_features.json (AI Overviews, People Also Ask, Top stories) · data/D2_reddit/D2_reddit_coded.csv (150 comments) · the codebook and review record in each folder's NOTE.md.

Limits. Google results come from one location (Rosedale, WA) on one date. Reddit data covers three threads in one subreddit. X, YouTube, and TikTok were not sampled. The optional AI answer-engine test (D3) was not run.